Simple Memo vs Tana
Which Should You Choose?

What is Tana?

Tana is a knowledge management tool from Norway. "Supertags" dynamically attach fields and views to nodes, managing knowledge as structured data. Features an outliner-based UI, AI integration, and search nodes (live queries). Free plan (beta) available; Pro ($10/mo planned). Web-based.

Comparison Table: Simple Memo vs Tana

4 Differences Between Supertags and Simple Memo

• 1Structured Data vs Free Text
  Tana's supertags add fields to nodes, building databases like CRMs or reading logs. Simple Memo just sends free text via email. If "structure comes later," prioritize capture speed with Simple Memo.
• 2Setup Time: Hours vs 30 Seconds
  Using Tana effectively requires hours of initial investment designing supertags, defining fields, and building search nodes. Simple Memo setup is just entering your email address — 30 seconds total.
• 3Learning Curve: Advanced PKM vs Anyone, Day One
  Tana's supertags, fields, commands, search nodes, and AI integration are for advanced PKM practitioners. Understanding the concepts alone can take weeks. Simple Memo is two steps — type and send — no manual needed.
• 4Mobile Experience: Browser vs Native 0.4s
  Tana is a web app, accessed via browser on smartphones. Loading takes 3-5 seconds, and supertag operations feel cumbersome on touch UI. Simple Memo is native iOS with ~1-second launch and one-tap send.

Are Tana's Supertags for Everyone?

Tana's supertag system is one of the most ambitious structuring features in any note-taking app. Simply tagging a node auto-adds fields, letting you manage contacts like a CRM or build reading log databases. Combined with live queries, you can create custom views that dynamically filter and display tagged data. But this power comes with tradeoffs. First, designing supertags requires significant upfront investment. Deciding "which fields to include," "how to structure tag hierarchies," and "what query conditions to set" can easily consume hours. And what many users discover is that they never fully utilize the complex schemas they built. Tags go unassigned, fields stay empty, queries never get revisited. There's a gap between the ideal of structured knowledge and daily practice. Simple Memo - for Obsidian takes the opposite approach. No schemas, no tags, no fields. Type text, send to email. That's it. Structure can happen later at the receiving end — Gmail, Notion, Obsidian. It's the philosophy of separating capture from organization. For power users who truly leverage supertags, Tana is an extraordinary tool. But for the 90% of moments when you just want to "jot something down," Simple Memo - for Obsidian's ~1-second capture is more practical. The question isn't which tool is better — it's whether your capture workflow should carry the weight of your organization system.

Who Should Choose Which?

FAQ

Practical Combined Workflow

Tana and Simple Memo complement rather than compete. The following workflow leverages both tools' strengths.

• 1On the go: Instant capture with Simple Memo
  Type your idea or task in 0.4 seconds and send with one tap. Don't think about supertags — just focus on capturing the thought.
• 2Back at your desk: Transfer from email to Tana
  Review memos in your inbox. Transfer important ones to Tana and assign appropriate supertags (#Meeting, #Idea, #Task, etc.).
• 3Weekly review: Organize with Tana's search nodes
  Use live queries to list this week's ideas. Leverage supertag fields for priority and progress tracking, then decide next actions.

When to Use Tana

In fairness, here are scenarios where Tana is genuinely the better choice. If these describe your primary needs, Tana is the right tool.

• 1Managing knowledge as a structured database
  Tana's supertags automatically add fields: "Person" gets email and company; "Book" gets ISBN and author. Notes become databases, enabling CRMs, reading logs, and research databases in one tool. Simple Memo has no data structuring capabilities.
• 2Creating dynamic views with live queries
  Tana's search nodes are saved queries that always show matching nodes in real time. Set filters like "Ideas created this week" or "High-priority tasks" and use them as dashboards. Simple Memo has no filtering or view features.
• 3Embedding AI into your workflow
  Tana's AI integration runs AI commands on nodes — summarize, translate, classify — integrated into supertag workflows for semi-automated knowledge management. Simple Memo has no AI features.
• 4Seriously practicing PKM methodologies
  Tana is designed for PKM methods like Zettelkasten, PARA, and GTD. Supertags can faithfully reproduce these frameworks. For those serious about PKM, the learning investment yields significant returns.

Migration Guide: Tana to Simple Memo - for Obsidian

This guide is for those overwhelmed by Tana's learning curve or seeking a simpler capture method. Using Tana and Simple Memo - for Obsidian together is ideal, but here are steps if you prioritize simplicity.

• 1Install Simple Memo - for Obsidian and set your email address
  Download Simple Memo - for Obsidian from the App Store. Just set your email and start immediately — no account creation needed. If you've waited for Tana invitations or spent time on setup, this simplicity will feel refreshing.
• 2Export your Tana data
  Export your data from Tana's settings in JSON format. The export includes supertag structures, so you can return to Tana later if needed. Store the export in a safe location.
• 3Switch your capture workflow to Simple Memo - for Obsidian
  Instead of opening Tana to create nodes, use Simple Memo - for Obsidian for ~1-second input and email delivery. Skip supertag selection and field entry — your "capture first" speed improves dramatically.
• 4Use your email inbox as a weekly review starting point
  Memos sent via Simple Memo - for Obsidian accumulate in your inbox. Review them weekly, transfer items needing structure to Tana, or simply organize with email folders. You may find that supertags aren't always necessary.

Related Pages